Sunday 8 September 2019

Creating a New World Order, One Region at a Time

hared and archived for educational purposes with thanks to original writer and publishers
The Deep State’s globalist plan for what insiders refer to as the “New World Order” — basically, a global government controlled by themselves — begins with submerging the sovereignty of nation-states into regional “orders.”

These are better understood as regional governments built using “free trade” deals as the foundation, with the European Union serving as the premier example. How do we know this is the plan? Because top Deep State globalists have said so publicly and repeatedly, and because that is the exact strategy being pursued openly.

All over the world, pseudo-“free trade” agreements and other sovereignty-shredding schemes are being used to transfer more and more power to transnational bureaucracies and courts.

And eventually, these regional orders will be interwoven into an overlapping patchwork of multilateral regimes on the road to creating a truly global authority, perhaps under the United Nations or some less-discredited future global body. At least, that is the glob­alist plan. But it is starting to show major cracks amid historic public backlash.

As far back as 1950, globalists had openly revealed their agenda for global government under the United Nations. In his book War or Peace, for example, global government-promoting Council on Foreign Relations co-founder John Foster Dulles spelled it out clearly. 

“The United Nations represents not a final stage in the development of world order, but only a primitive stage,” Dulles wrote. 

“Therefore its primary task is to create the conditions which will make possible a more highly developed organization.” 

In the same book, Dulles went on to argue that the existing UN Charter was strong enough to serve as the foundation for a world government. 

“I have never seen any proposal made for collective security with ‘teeth’ in it, or for ‘world government’ or for ‘world federation,’ which could not be carried out either by the United Nations or under the United Nations Charter,” he said.

Unfortunately for globalists, though, humanity was not yet ready to surrender its sovereignty to an all-powerful world government. Thus, regionalization. 

In a 1962 report headlined “A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations,” financed by the U.S. State Department, CFR member and longtime State Department official Lincoln Bloomfield argued that global government could be brought about via regionalism. 

In the plan, he proposed that “ever larger units evolve through customs unions, confederation, regionalism, etc., until ultimately the larger units coalesce under a global umbrella.” Sound familiar?

Of course, that is precisely the strategy that has been used, primarily relying on “free-trade” schemes — in addition to going to war and threatening war, other key tactics highlighted in the Bloomfield report.  

By 1974, almost a quarter of a century after CFR founder Dulles wrote his infamous book, the globalist organization’s mouthpiece, the magazine dubbed Foreign Affairs, was telegraphing its strategy of globalism via incrementalism to globalist insiders and useful idiots everywhere. 

“In short, the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down,” wrote former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Richard N. Gardner in April of 1974. “An end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”

In short, globalists recognized the reality that people were not willing to relinquish control over their own nations and their own destinies all at once. Instead, the plan would have to be pursued slowly, quietly, and deceptively. 

And so, piece by piece, sovereignty was eroded using tools such as “free trade,” international agreements, regional military alliances such as the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and more. Central to the plot was convincing nations and peoples to surrender sovereignty not to some global government-in-waiting right away, but to regional organizations.

Consider former National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, a longtime CFR member and one of the key figures behind globalist mastermind David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission.

In 1995, speaking at former Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev’s “State of the World Forum,” attended by The New American magazine’s senior editor William F. Jasper, Brzezinski outlined the plan clearly, perhaps assuming he was speaking just to fellow globalists and friends. 

“We cannot leap into world government in one quick step,” he said. “In brief, the precondition for eventual globalization — genuine globalization — is progressive regionalization, because thereby we move toward larger, more stable, more cooperative units.”

Also in 1995, the UN-created “Commission on Global Governance” — yes, it really was called the “Commission on Global Governance” — outlined precisely the same strategy in its “Our Global Neighborhood” report. 

“The UN must gear itself for a time when regionalism becomes more ascendant worldwide and assist the process in advance of that time,” wrote the globalists on the UN commission, foreshadowing the strategy that was about to go into overdrive. 

“Regional co-operation and integration should be seen as an important and integral part of a balanced system of global governance.”

Regional Governments Everywhere

This regionalization and “integration” as a steppingstone toward globalization of political and economic power is exactly what is happening worldwide.

Here are some of the more prominent examples — it is in no way an exhaustive list:

• European Union: The EU is by far the most developed supranational regime in the world, with former Soviet dictator Mikhail Gorbachev approvingly describing it as “the new European Soviet” during a 2000 visit to Britain. 

Originally, it started as a “Coal and Steel” agreement between six nations after World War II. With key support of Deep State institutions such as Bilderberg, the CFR, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and more, it gradually usurped more and more power under the guise of “free trade.” 

Over the decades, it morphed into the European Economic Community, the European Community, and finally, the European Union. By 2012, then-EU Commission President José Manuel Barroso, a former Maoist revolutionary, was boasting of the machinations that The New American had been warning of for decades, a plot that globalists had generally denied as the EU was forming. 

“We will need to move toward a federation,” he said. “This is our political horizon.” 

Today, the EU has a single currency, a law-enforcement agency, a proto-continental military, and much more. Brussels, where the monster is headquartered, has stolen more power than even the U.S. federal government has taken from U.S. states in some areas, purporting to have the authority to veto national budgets passed by member states’ elected parliaments. 

Despite being opposed by citizens in referendums at virtually every turn, the EU is still working to become “deeper” by usurping more power, and “wider” by adding more and more members. It is also working to export its globalist model of total centralized power to other regions of the world.

• African Union: The AU is another one of the more advanced regional unions smashing national sovereignty and imposing unelected, supranational rulers on diverse peoples. Already, the AU has a “Parliament,” a military, a “Court of Justice,” and more. 

It is working on a continental currency, too. Because Africa is so vast and undeveloped, the globalist overlords are actually using the same plan they are pursuing at the global level to subsume nation-states, but on a continental scale. 

Consider the emerging “Tripartite Free Trade Area.” Under the plan, various “free trade” areas on the African continent are to eventually be merged into a single, continent-wide “free trade” regime with open borders from Cape Town to Cairo, and a single African passport. 

For a sneak preview of the future under this regional regime, consider that genocidal Marxist dictator Robert Mugabe was made chairman of the AU before being overthrown by his own military. 

And of course, it is an undisputed fact that outsiders — primarily the U.S. government, the EU, and the dictatorship enslaving China — are funding and imposing the AU on Africans. Beijing built the AU headquarters. The EU, meanwhile, funds more than 80 percent of the AU’s program budget.

• Union of South American States: In South America, globalists and communists have foisted on the peoples an emerging superstate known as UNASUL or UNASUR, depending on the language. 

Inspired by the EU, the forces behind this sovereignty-shredding scheme envision a United States of South America, complete with a South American military, currency, parliament, and more.

Until recent disagreements over the brutal socialist dictatorship enslaving Venezuela caused some member states to temporarily suspend their participation, the socialist- and communist-dominated supranational body was quickly usurping a vast array of powers from member states. 

And as is the case in other parts of the world being subsumed under regional governments, UNASUL / UNASUR is merely one of a vast constellation of supranational institutions in Latin America working to “integrate” the formerly sovereign nation-states into a “regional order,” to be followed by the “world order.”

Others include MERCOSUR, the Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America (ALBA), the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC), and many others.

• Eurasian Union: In “Eurasia,” Russian strongman Vladimir Putin is spearheading the creation of what is currently known as the Eurasian Economic Union, or EEU. It brings together Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan, with other countries being inducted.

Eventually, they hope to expand the union to include other former Soviet states, particularly from the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).

“It took Europe 40 years to move from the European Coal and Steel Community to the full European Union,” Putin observed in an op-ed for Izvestia, adding that the Eurasian Union is “proceeding at a much faster pace because we could draw on the experience of the EU and other regional associations.”

The harmonized Eurasian regulatory regime is “in most cases consistent with European standards,” he added, noting that it was “based on World Trade Organization principles,” while promising that the union would “help ensure global sustainable development.”

Putin noted that eventually, the EU and the Eurasian Union could create a “harmonized community of economies stretching from Lisbon to Vladivostok, a free trade zone and even employing more sophisticated integration patterns” that would pursue “coordinated policies in industry, technology, the energy sector, education, science, and also to eventually scrap visas.”

Ultimately, “existing regional institutions, such as the EU, NAFTA, APEC, ASEAN inter alia,” would become “the integration bricks that can be used to build a more sustainable global economy.” Top EU leaders have echoed that rhetoric exactly. Note the reference to NAFTA, too.

Around the world, there is a dizzying array of other “integration” schemes working to amalgamate once-sovereign nation-states into regional unions. For instance, in the Middle East, the already functioning Gulf Cooperation Council is becoming a supranational regime over the nations of the Arabian Peninsula. 

Meanwhile, globalists from the CFR and beyond are working to put the entire region under what they tout as a “Middle East Union.” 

“Just as a warring [European] continent found peace through unity by creating what became the EU, Arabs, Turks, Kurds and other groups in the region could find relative peace in ever closer union,” claimed Mohamed “Ed” Husain, an “adjunct senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies” at the CFR, in a 2014 piece published in the Financial Times. 

In South East Asia, the “Association of South East Asian Nations,” more commonly known as ASEAN, is doing the same. 

In North America, globalist architect Henry “New World Order” Kissinger described NAFTA, which set up international tribunals and bureaucracies, as “the most creative step toward a new world order taken by any group of countries since the end of the Cold War.”

Worldwide Deception

There is no populated region on Earth not being subsumed under regional government right now. Obviously, the notion that people all around the world just woke up one day seeking to surrender sovereignty to a regional government is ludicrous. It was all by design, of course. But all along, those responsible were deceiving the public.

For instance, while shackling the United Kingdom to the emerging European superstate, then-British Prime Minister Edward Heath blatantly lied.

“There are some in this country who fear that in going into Europe we shall in some way sacrifice independence and sovereignty,” Heath said in a January 1973 prime ministerial TV broadcast. “These fears, I need hardly say, are completely unjustified.”

Of course, not only were those concerns completely justified, they underestimated the subversion of sovereignty that would be taking place.

By 2016, the British people had wised up, with more people voting to secede from the EU with Brexit than have ever voted for anything in U.K. history. Globalists are now doing everything possible to overturn the vote, again using deception.

Almost three decades after Heath’s lies, in a July 13, 2000 interview with the newspaper La Stampa, then-Italian Prime Minister Giuliano Amato outlined the strategy of deception.

“The Union is the vanguard of this changing world: it indicates a future of princes without sovereignty,” he said.

“The new entity is faceless and those who are in command can neither be pinned down nor elected.... That is the way Europe was made too: by creating communitarian organisms without giving the organisms presided over by national governments the impression that they were being subjected to a higher power.... 

“I don’t think it is a good idea to replace this slow and effective method — which keeps national States free from anxiety while they are being stripped of power — with great institutional leaps. Therefore I prefer to go slowly, to crumble pieces of sovereignty up little by little, avoiding brusque transitions from national to [EU] federal power.”

Must-read: The Complete History of the Freemasonry and the Creation of the New World Order

Global Merger of Regions

Globalists have been getting bolder in recent years, speaking openly of their machinations and intentions. For instance, former National Security Advisor and Secretary of State Henry Kissingeroutlined the same plot to advance globalism as his co-conspirator Brzezinski did two decades earlier at Gorbachev’s confab, just more openly. 

“The contemporary quest for world order will require a coherent strategy to establish a concept of order within the various regions and to relate these regional orders to one another,” Kissinger explained in an excerpt from his book World Order that appeared on August 29, 2014, under the headline “Henry Kissinger on the Assembly of a New World Order” in the Wall Street Journal. 

Calling for a “structure of international rules and norms” that is “fostered as a matter of common conviction,” he praised, in particular, developments on the other side of the Atlantic. 

“Europe has set out to transcend the state,” Kissinger said. Despite the use of opaque and sterile language, it is clear that Kissinger was calling for the world’s nations and peoples to be divided up into “regional orders” as a prelude to the “New World Order” finale.

And as the EU works to transcend the nation-state at home, it is working simultaneously to do the same worldwide, including in North America. In a revealing document released in June 2016, the EU actually vowed to “support cooperative regional orders worldwide,” including in the Americas, while touting global governance composed of regional governments based on a “strong UN.”

“We will invest in regional orders, and in cooperation among and within regions,” the superstate declared in its “Global Strategy” document, echoing almost precisely the schemes outlined by Kissinger in his book World Order. “And we will promote reformed global governance.... The EU will strive for a strong UN as the bedrock of the multilateral rules-based order.”

Ironically, the EU document acknowledges that people are upset with the globalist agenda. Indeed, the EU “Global Strategy” document was released just five days after Brexit sent shock waves through the globalist movement worldwide. 

But the official document goes on to suggest that surreptitiously undermining self-government around the world to build regional governments is all for the good of humanity, and so it must be pursued anyway. 

“In a world caught between global pressures and local pushback, regional dynamics come to the fore,” the document argued. 

“Voluntary forms of regional governance offer states and peoples the opportunity to better manage security concerns, reap the economic gains of globalization, express more fully cultures and identities, and project influence in world affairs.”

Eventually, as Kissinger and others explained, after these regional governments are in full control, the plan is to begin merging them with each other in overlapping regional governments, again using “trade” as the pretext. 

The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, for example, was aimed at bringing the EU and North America together under transatlantic bureaucracies, a longtime globalist goal that has been worked on for generations. This transatlantic union would then create regulations and supranational kangaroo courts over more than half of global GDP.

On the other side of the United States, the Trans-Pacific Partnership did virtually the same thing. Taken together, the supranational regulatory regime that would emerge from the “trade” regimes would govern virtually the entire global economy, with even nations that were not technically under its thumb being forced to submit just to continue participating in trade.

If the American people do not actively oppose these plans en masse, the result will be the end of self-government, liberty, prosperity, and Western Christian civilization.
Share:

The British Accredited Registry or BAR



BAR

Who or what is the BAR ? Who do they work for? What jurisdiction do they operate in?
During the middle 1600’s, the Crown of England established a formal registry in London where barristers were ordered by the Crown to be accredited. The establishment of this first International Bar Association allowed barrister-lawyers from all nations to be formally recognized and accredited by the only recognized accreditation society. From this, the acronym BAR was established denoting (informally) the British Accredited Registry, whose members became a powerful and integral force within the International Bar Association (IBA). Although this has been denied repeatedly as to its existence, the acronym BAR stood for the British barrister-lawyers who were members of the larger IBA.
When America was still a chartered group of British colonies under patent – established in what was formally named the British Crown territory of New England – the first British Accredited Registry (BAR) was established in Boston during 1761 to attempt to allow only accredited barrister-lawyers access to the British courts of New England. This was the first attempt to control who could represent defendants in the court at or within the bar in America.
Today, each corporate STATE has it’s own BAR Association that licenses government officer attorneys, NOT lawyers. In reality, the courts only allow their officer attorneys to freely enter within the bar while prohibiting those learned of the law – lawyers – to do so. They prevent advocates, lawyers, counselors, barristers and solicitors from entering through the outer bar. Only licensed BAR Attorneys are permitted to freely enter within the bar separating the people from the bench because all BAR Attorneys are officers of the court itself.
Does that tell you anything? Read more about the tricky word-game used at:http://www.angelfire.com/az/sthurston/Hiding_Behind_the_BAR.html
BAR is an acronym for ‘British Accreditation Regency’ which forms individual state and provincial bars. The “bar” is literally the wooden railing which separates the spectator section of the courtroom from the front section where the judge and lawyers (those ‘admitted to the bar’) sit. Ask an attorney about the BAR oath; it specifies the 1st loyalty is to the court, the 2nd to the State.

One may call the Rule of the world today by many names: The New World Order (a Bush family favorite), the Third Way (spoken by Tony Blair and Bill Clinton), the Illuminati, Triad, Triangle, Trinity, Masonry, the United Nations, the EU, the US, Mystery Babylon or many other names.
However, they all point to one origin and one beginning. We have traced this in history to the Crown Temple, the Temple Church circa 1200. Because the Pope created the Order of the Temple Knights (the Grand Wizards of deception) and established their mighty Temple Church in the sovereign City of London, it is the Pope and his Roman Capitols who control the world.

CROWN TEMPLE B.A.R.

By TLB Staff Writer: David-William
The Crown Temple
By Rule of Mystery Babylon
The Templars of the Crown

Crown Temple – History of the Protocols of Sion

By Michael Edward-  Ecclesiastic Commonwealth Community (ECC)
July 15, 2003

The governmental and judicial systems within the United States of America, at both federal and local state levels, is owned by the “Crown,” which is a private foreign power. Before jumping to conclusions about the Queen of England or the Royal Families of Britain owning the U.S.A., this is a different “Crown” and is specifically referencing the established Templar Church, known for centuries by the world as the “Crown.”
knights-templars

The Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar in two parts: the Round and the Chancel. The Round Church was consecrated in 1185 and modeled after the circular Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. The Chancel was built in 1240. The Temple Church serves both the Inner and Middle Temples and is located between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment at the Thames River. Its grounds also house the Crown Offices at Crown Office Row.
All licensed Bar Attorneys in the U.S. owe their allegiance and give their solemn oath in pledge to the Crown Temple, realizing this or not. This is simply due to the fact that all Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the international Bar Association located at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple, which are physically located at Chancery Lane behind Fleet Street in London.
The Inns of Court to the Crown Temple use the Banking and Judicial system of the City of London – a sovereign and independent territory which is not a part of Great Britain (just as Washington DC is not a part of the north American states, nor is it a state) to defraud, coerce, and manipulate the American people. These Fleet Street bankers and lawyers are committing crimes in America under the guise and color of law.
 
 
 

The Jesuits are the Ancient Knights Templar

The Jesuit Order has its origins back as the Knights Templar. There were many Knights Templars but the Pope only spared a small amount of Templars. These Templars were allowed to go to the powerful Kingdom of Aragon and become the Order of the Calatrava since they were not allowed to be called Knights Templar. These then were connected with the later Order of the Montessa. Both of these orders exist today and are now controlled by the Jesuit trained King Juan Carlos of Spain. The same King Juan Carlos who carries the most powerful Templar title called the ‘King of Jerusalem‘ known as the ‘Protector of the Holy Sites of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem‘. A title which gives him complete power over the Middle East and North Africa, do a study of his powerful Union for the Mediterranean headed in Barcelona Spain and also based in Malta. King Juan Carlos heads the powerful Bourbon bloodline which is the second oldest monarchy behind only the Japanese Emperor. King Juan Carlos dominates the Commonwealth Crown and second layer of the Papal Tiara.
 
(i) In 1185, following the successful Pisan campaign to capture major Greek Island from the Byzantines using Basque, Sicilian, Gascon and English mercenaries, the Pisans agreed to establish a branch of their banking empire known as the Ordo Pauperes Templum or “Order of the Poor of the (Money) Temple” in London. King Henry II Plantagenet (1154-1189) of England granted the “Knights Templar” the former grounds of Southampton House and surrounds west from Arundel St and the boundaries of the Thames and Fleet St east to the boundary of Bouverie St and Temple Ave; and
(ii) Similar to all banking compounds of the Pisan banking order, the Knights Templar commissioned significant and imposing stone defenses and walls to be erected around its London land holding, completed by 1194, with two (2) minor entrances to the east and west, one (1) major entrance from the docks and area onto the Thames (now known as the Middle Temple Gatehouse) and the primary land gate located at the beginning of Fleet st near St Clement Danes known as Bar Gate, or simply the Bar; and
(iii) Within the walled compound known collectively as “The Temple”, the Pisan banking order created a massive wall following the path of Essex St dividing the western compound and the “Bar Gate” from the eastern remainder of the compound. This became known as the Outer Temple and was the walled compound in which banking, money changing, conveyances, loans and credit were conducted via entrance from the north or “Bar Gate”. By tradition, a merchant or trader had to be “admitted to the Bar” in order to engage in commerce within the walled compound known as the “Outer Temple”; and
(iv) A second internal wall was also constructed dividing the Outer Temple to the west from the north eastern part of the Temple compound following the Middle Temple Lane. This internal divide separated the Outer Temple from the Middle Temple area and the “Inner Temple” to the north east corner. The Middle Temple area then housed warehouses, markets were erected connected from the south gate (Middle Temple Gate) and the warehouses and docks for merchants. The Middle Temple was therefore for wholesale trade and business between merchants of the sea and the bank; and
(v) The Inner Temple to the North East corner was only accessible by an internal gate from the Middle Temple and the East Gate and was the main treasure vaults, chancery of documents and accommodation for banking staff, mercenaries and visiting Pisan nobles.

Note: Blackstone tells us in his Commentaries on the Laws of England that it was also the Pisans who “discovered” the long dead Digests of Justinian at Amalfi and so revived the “civil” imperial Roman Empire rules as “law”; this is where our Cult of Personality comes from…

The Hidden Role of Judges

Judges are Jesuit priests. Their hidden role is to charge you with something, so that you can be used as a battery to charge the corporations (corpses or dead entities) of the Dark Forces (groups of demons) and their New World Order. For strong evidence of this, read my empowering article titled The Esoteric Definition of Battery.
Did you know the word corporation (corp-o-ration) has the word corpsein it, and therefore its hidden definition is “a dead body“. The word corporation can also be written as corp. Phonetically, the root word corpsounds similar to the word corpse, which is defined as “a dead body, usually of a human being.” Do you still need more evidence? According to Black’s Law Dictionary 6th Edition, a corporation is “an artificial personor legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state.” An artificial person is considered a dead entity, because it does not exist in the real world.
Have you ever wondered why judges wear black robes? The black robe uniform is the symbol representing a Jesuit priest that worships the god Saturn. During the ancient times, Saturn was associated with the god of law and justice. Today, many secret societies still worship Saturn as the god of law and justice.
According to Jordan Maxwell, the symbol that was used in the religious context for Saturn was the square and its symbolic color was black. This is why judges wear a black robe. It is their way of showing respect to Saturn, the god of law and justice. Whether judges realize it or not, they are religious priests who have been brainwashed by the Dark Forces to cast dark magic spells on people when they are in court.
 
The legal system is saturated with dark magic. This is why the letter that the court used to notify you to appear in court is called a summons letter. What do witches do when they need to call spirits to appear in front of them? They summon them! They did not call it a summons letter by accident. A lot of court documents also have seals on them. These seals are sigils that are used for real magic rituals. Be aware that magic can be used for good or evil purposes.

Did You Know Bar Attorneys are Templar Agents?

As for attorneys, especially Bar attorneys, they are Templar agents. These agents are committing crimes in the USA, Canada, Australia, and other certain countries under the guise and color of law. Bar attorneys work for the same secret organizations (the Crown of England and the Crown Temple) that tried to enslave the American people in the 1700s.
These two secret organizations were heavily involved in the killing of Americans during the American War of Independence. Today, the Crown of England and the Crown Temple still have the same dark agendas. Unfortunately, they have already taken over the court and political system of the USA over 100 years ago. These two secret organizations are controlled by the Vatican, which is the religious center for the Dark Forces.
People who work for the legal system are unknowingly or knowingly abetting FRAUD. This system is run by a bunch of CRIMINALS working for the CROWN OF ENGLAND, the CROWN TEMPLE, and the VATICAN. Because of this, nearly all judges and Bar attorneys are traitors to the human race. However, there are some judges and attorneys who are working for the legal system, because they want to learn how it really works, so that they can expose the corruption in the legal system and teach others how to prevent it from enslaving the human race. To find good solutions to a problem, you need to be aware of it and know how it works.

Middle Temple

 
History
The Middle Temple and the other three Inns of Court were established by the middle of the 14th century. The Inn’s name derives from the Knights Templar who had been in possession of the Temple site for over 150 years prior to that.
 
 

BAR Association history & who owns the U.S.

the real American history not taught in schools on the 227th anniversary of the first 4th of July 1776;
 

Why Attorneys Are Not Lawyers And Lawyers Are Owned by the Crown of England

July 28, 2016
In the U.S., they’re collectively called everything from “attorney” to “lawyer” to “counselor.” Are these terms truly equivalent, or has the identity of one been mistaken for another?
What exactly is a “Licensed BAR Attorney?”
A credential accompanies every legal paper produced by attorneys – along with a State BAR Certification number. The credential is issued by the boards of law examiners, the applicant having acquired a minimum competency in law. In most cases, the board is an independent, self-financing, separately incorporated group of law professionals, administered by the state bar association, a branch of the American Bar Association, functioning in an advisory capacity to the supreme court of each of the states. Simply stated, they are an advisory board of recommendation to the court. The accreditation number is issued by the state bar association, a professional dues paying union.
As we are about to show you, an ‘attorney’ is not a ‘lawyer,’ yet the average American improperly interchanges these words as if they represent the same occupation, and the average American attorney unduly accepts the honor to be called “lawyer” when he is not.
In order to discern the difference, and where we stand within the current court system, it’s necessary to examine the British origins of our U.S. courts and the terminology that has been established from the beginning. It’s important to understand the proper lawful definitions for the various titles we now give these court related occupations.

All BAR members are foreign agents of the Crown

Posted on April 1, 2017 by David Robinson

Anna - Bar members

IMPORTANT QUESTION SUBJECT For Present and Former Bar Association Members

By Anna Von Reitz
Remember Eve in the Garden of Eden? Satan said that if she ate the apple, she wouldn’t die…..and she didn’t…..at least not right away…..?

Remember when your parents (who were deceived themselves) or a well-intentioned employer told you that you “had to have a Social Security Number”? And that is true, if you happened to be applying for employment with the federal government. Then, of course, you would need to enroll in their retirement and employee benefits program….but not otherwise.

And it is the same thing with the Bar Associations telling new JD graduates that they have to have a Bar Card….which is true, if you want to be a prosecutor for the federal government corporations and their “federated state of state franchises” and an employee of the court, but otherwise not.

The pure fact is that there is no requirement for anyone to be a Bar Association Member to engage in the profession of law in this country and there never has been. I defy anyone anywhere to prove that there is any general requirement to be a Bar Member to use the court facilities, present cases, or offer effective counsel to others with or without pay.

The fact is that the perpetuation of these “mandatory” Social Security enrollment and Bar Association Membership half-truths are undertaken in self-interest by undeclared foreign interests. Look up the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) if you think I am lying. Also see Trinsey v. Pagliaro and the cases that Robert F. Kennedy fought pertaining to these issues.

Happily, quite a number of the best people working in the profession of law today have realized this and they are leaving the Bar to stew in its own juice. This is happening as a result of Bar Associations kicking members out for the sin of actually defending and protecting their clients’ best interest, and it is happening as a result of lawyers waking up, going, “OMG!” — and ripping up their Bar Cards accordingly.
The lawyers among us are now waking up along with the rest of the populace and realizing that they have been sold a total bill of goods, and that the Bar Associations and their members will be held accountable for their misdeeds.

The fact is that lawyers can function either as attorneys-at-law or they can function as counselors-at-law. These are “capacities” within the profession in which a lawyer can choose to work, just as you can choose to work in the capacity of a hotel manager or a hotel bartender and still be working in a hotel.
Attorneys join the Bar to gain group insurance and bonding benefits. Also so their buddies in the fraternity will gang up on any outsiders.

Counselors pay their own insurance and bonds and otherwise don’t have any reason to join the Bar, because they aren’t involved in the disposition of public property or addressing issues related to public employees– that is, they aren’t working in administrative capacities as members of an administrative court.

Attorneys-at-law traditionally function as property managers involved in the administration of civil cases in Article I courts dealing with in-house legislative “laws” and statutes. This is why those working in administrative courts supported by the United States Districts, the Territorial States of States, and the Municipal STATES OF STATES are all required to be “attorneys” and Bar Members by their employers.

Attorneys work in administrative tribunals. Not judicial courts.

This fact accounts for these frank admissions about the nature of the federal territorial and municipal courts and their various state-of-state franchises operating on our shores:
“There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789, Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statues and Codes. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators.” FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178
“Courts are Administrative Tribunals” Clearfield Trust, et al v. United States 318 U.S. 363 (1943).

Counselors-at-law traditionally function in judicial court capacities and have the duty to protect and defend their living clientele, unlike their attorney-at-law brethren who are limited to dealing with public property and public employees and incorporated “things”, either belonging to or working for or working with the government corporations.

Naturally, when a counselor-at-law appears a number of things are different about the nature and tenor of the proceedings.

A counselor-at-law is not required to enter an appearance prior to a court date and may simply walk in with a brief explanation to the judge that he or she is working in the capacity of a counselor-at-law and providing effective assistance to the Plaintiff or Defendant.

Often, to further clarify things, the judge will ask if the counselor-at-law is a member of the Bar Association. If not, the proper response is simply, “I don’t have a card (or more properly, a “ticket”) with the Bar.”

This is referring obliquely to the Bid Bond that the Bar Associations post in maritime cases involving incorporated entities, and is further signaling the judge that the Plaintiff or Defendant is appearing in the capacity of a living man or woman and that the court has to shift gears from bartending to hotel management– or, as it actually is for these courts, from international sea jurisdiction to international land jurisdiction.

The first difference for the court’s notice when a counselor-at-law appears is the explicit revelation of the capacity in which the Plaintiff/Defendant is operating.

If he or she is operating in their actual, living capacity as a man or woman standing on the land jurisdiction of the United States, they are owed all their constitutional rights and guarantees including a counselor-at-law who can advise them but not “represent” them, because they are presumed to be free people above the age of twenty-one and competent to make their own decisions. That’s why they have hired a counselor-at-law instead of an attorney.

That is also why they are forcing the court to engage them as people under the Public Law of the United States or the General Session Law of the State instead of as “things” subject to the Private Administrative Law of any foreign territorial or municipal corporation or state of state or incorporated county franchise tribunal.

Attorneys represent “things” — corporate franchises, wards of the state, bankrupt businesses, murdered victims of crime, mentally incompetent people, –all things that cannot “stand for” or answer for themselves. That is why they have to be “re-presented” by a substitute acting “for” them.

Counselors-at-law assist in presenting cases for living people.

Notice the difference: attorneys “represent” and administer the affairs of their clients often without regard for or even consulting with their clients. For example, they cut plea-bargains and waive rights and sell off property in whatever way best benefits the court. This is because they work for the court and the client is at best considered a public trust subject to the court’s administration. And this is true whether you pay the blighter or not.

Notice that counselors-at-law “present” cases with and for their patrons, who administer their own affairs and make their own decisions throughout the proceedings, retain all their rights and prerogatives and do not willingly subject themselves to the court’s administration.

Now, obviously, from the court’s standpoint, it is very convenient to be able to dictate whatever happens in each and every case, so as to “administer” it as best suits the “public good” and the “good of the court” —and the court’s corporate employers, of course, without regard for any such niceties as equity owed to living people, or any rights owed to living people.

Just as obviously, it is a death knell to justice and an end to all freedom for living people to allow this state of affairs to go on.

When even the lawyers among us are so dumbed down and ignorant that they think the Bar Association has the power to obstruct them from pursuing their vocation, it’s time to outlaw the Bar Associations, because they are clearly over-stepping any rational function or status that they have.

U.S. District, State of State and STATE OF STATE courts can demand whatever credentials they wish from people that they hire to represent their interests, just as other private and public interests can demand whatever credentials they desire from their employees.

Turning this situation around requires all of us, including the legal eagles among us, to wake up and take responsibility for what we are doing and what we are allowing. If a “State of State” Legislature can pass a statutory “law” saying that all its court officials have to be Bar Association Members, our State Legislatures can just as easily pass a General Session law saying that none of our courts will allow Bar Association Members.

Pay attention to what I am telling you: State of Wyoming is a Territorial Franchise Court. STATE OF WYOMING is a Municipal Franchise Court. Both of these are foreign corporation franchises like the local Target store. They are limited to running administrative tribunals and they can require all the people in their “court system” to be Bar Association members until the cows come home, because these are private administrative tribunals.

But the Wyoming State Court belongs to the people of Wyoming and they run judicial courts of record that are superior to any private administrative tribunals and they can mandate that no Bar Association members are allowed to practice law in their venue —thereby providing plenty of work for counselors-at-law.

That this great country and its people have been hoodwinked and pulled off course for so long by selfish private interests is an immense and horrifying Breach of Trust, but it is one that we can swiftly rectify by changing our own presumed political status and thereby changing the “presumed” capacity in which we choose to act in court and also changing the capacity in which our lawyers act.

All those former Bar Attorneys and those who are thinking seriously now of tearing up those cards? Learn the truth and set yourselves free of the imaginary shackles that the Bar Associations have placed on you. You can come into any court in this country in the capacity of a Counselor-at-Law and there is nothing any of the courts can say except, “Yes, of course….”


Judge Anna: Regarding BAR Members –


On Jan 7, 2016, at 1:32 AM, Anna von Reitz wrote:

It’s Late, Past Midnight Again…..
I just want to send out a little LOVE to all the Bar Association Members out there who are feeling like I really hate their guts and want to bash their rice bowls and do all sorts of mean, bad, and nasty things to them. (It’s probably just an overactive guilty conscience, indigestion, or the flu.)
Of course, putting a huge commercial obligation lien on their organizations and reminding everyone that they are out of compliance with the Bar Association Treaty that allows them to be on our soil at all and that they have functioned as licensed privateers on our shores and helped defraud the American people and deny us remedy we are owed and generally been heavy contributors to the rotten state of the world in general….yes, I can see why you think that I despise members of the BAR.
What I really think is that many of you, more than half, have been kept as ignorant as your victims. I think that there are plenty of patriotic, God-fearing, decent, hard-working American Lawyers out there, who just need to do one thing to be reinstated as Americans and loyal members of Decent Society: tear up your BAR cards.
Just tear them up and set yourselves free. And then join us in the biggest housecleaning in history! Join the American Common Law Court System founded 1602, by far the oldest and most honorable Court System in the country, the most powerful, the most interesting, and by far the sweetest to work for.
Go to bed at night and sleep like a child (which I am about to do). Have a spotlessly clean conscience. Smile at all the poor sots that are being pelted with rotten eggs by outraged citizens. Be a hero instead. Best of all, actually do what you have been trained to do, and do it in an honorable way and for an honorable cause— to save the country of your birth, to protect your family and friends and neighbors.
Don’t stand around worrying that you won’t be able to work in the courts. Pretty soon all the Special Admiralty courts in this country are going to be shut down. Pretty soon, the Federal Courts are going to be reduced to arguing over how many bales of hay were filched by Department of Agriculture employees last year. Pretty soon the only “Admiralty” cases you will ever see or hear about, will be actual cases in Admiralty— you know, with real ships and real cargo? Imagine it.
Do you all realize that the Bar Associations that have indulged in all these crimes against America and Americans are also in violation of all sorts of Federal Law? They have been operating closed union shops for decades in open defiance of the Taft-Hartley Act and the Smith Act— and getting away with it. They’ve been cracking the whip and controlling appointments and threatening you whenever you aren’t politically correct? They’ve been increasing the fees and the penalties until its like dealing with the Gestapo and there is that really UNSAVORY “political” feeling to all of it?
Yup.
Whether you are a rat or not, it’s time to jump ship and start swimming.

Judge Anna von Reitz: THE AMERICAN COURT SYSTEM FOR DUMMIES — And Especially for Snopes.dumb


From: Anna von Reitz <avannavon@gmail.com>Date: Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 7:04 PM
 
For those who have been attempting to “look me up” among the Bar Association Members in Alaska or searching for my face among the judges of the Administrative and Admiralty Courts —you won’t find me or any of the other Common Law or Federal (Postal District instead of US District) Judges in those locations, because we are part of the Land Courts and they are part of the Corporate and Maritime Courts.There are three(3) Court Systems in America: (1) Common Law; (2) Administrative Law; (3) Maritime/Admiralty (which includes Martial Law).
 
Common Law is the Law of the Land, which includes the Organic Law of this Country—- The Declaration of Independence, The Articles of Confederation, The Constitutions (1787) and (1789- 1791), plus the Public Law, the United States Statutes-at-Large. This is all “Land Law” affecting “Land Assets”, which includes people, livestock, houses, barns, etc., etc., And this is why Amendment VII specifically requires Common Law regarding all important decisions regarding people and their property interests.Our Common Law Courts came here with the first Colonists and have continued to function for over 400 years despite all efforts of the Bar Associations to get rid of them. That’s because Bar Members can’t work in Common Law Courts in America—- it is forbidden by our Constitution because Bar Members hold a title from a foreign government (“Esquire” from Britain—-) and no such conflict of interest is allowed. Therefore, no Common Law Judges, such as myself, are Bar Members. We don’t appear as Bar Members and we don’t appear as members of the Administrative or Maritime/Admiralty Courts as a result. And here is a big, fat “Duh!” for all those who have been rampaging around “exposing” what they don’t know, and claiming to “know for certain” that I am a “fake” and listening to Bar Association Members who have an axe to grind because they are in competition with the Common Law Courts actually required by our Constitution. The same Bar Association Members who have been acting in treasonous disregard of the Organic Law of this country and who are about to get served their cajones on toast, with or without croutons, have been trying to avoid the facts for decades, but the persistent Truth has a way of dispelling oceans of Shinola. Read Amendment VII and realize that according to Thompkins v. Erie Railroad, there is no Federal “General Common Law” which means the ONLY form of “common law” in the Federale’s kit-bag is Martial Common Law, which they have been applying improperly to us “non-resident aliens” and “non-combatant civilians” and using as a means to usurp jurisdiction owed to the landlords. Thank you, very much. Applause and donations are due to me, but especially to John Trowbridge today. All the Gurus who think I am kidding are about to not only get the smiles wiped from their faces, but their butts relocated to their occipital domes.And all you Bar Members out there—- better start gathering around burn barrels in the public squares—- bring your Bar Cards.
 
Source: https://scannedretina.com/2016/01/11/judge-anna-von-reitz-the-american-court-system-for-dummies-and-especially-for-snopes-dumb/
 

Are we being “be-devilled”?

The Devil’s Handbook

Faculty of Advocates; Advocates Library; Parliament House; Edinburgh
The Devil’s Handbook 2004 / 2005 with interesting titles such as:
SECTION 1: THE FRAMEWORK
1.1 THE STRUCTURE OF DEVILLING
1.1.1 Working with Devilmasters
1.2 THE DUTIES OF DEVILS
1.2.1 Registration of devils
1.2.3 Devil’s Check List
1.2.4 Devilmasters’ Report
1.3 THE DUTIES OF DEVILMASTERS
1.5.3 The Faculty Officers
1.5.4 The Dean of Faculty
SECTION 2: DEVILLING
2.1 INTRODUCTION TO DEVILLING
2.3 CONDUCT WHILE DEVILLING
2.4 MONITORING PROGRESS DURING DEVILLING
2.4.2 Devillling Check Lists
2.6.1 Funding of Devilling
SECTION 3: HANDLING PROBLEMS IN DEVILLING
3.2.1 Devilmasters
APPENDIX 2: SCHEME FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF DEVILS
 
 
The 1893 Dictionary of Arts and Sciences, Encyclopedia Britannica, a dictionary of arts, sciences, and general literature / The R.S Peale 9th 1893 defines the word “LEGAL” in 5 words: “The undoing of God’s Law.”
 
 

GENERAL COUNCIL OF THE BAR OF SOUTH AFRICA

UNIFORM RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
1.7 Seniority
1.7.1 Senior Counsel are all members holding Letters Patent from H.M. The Queen or from the State President. Senior Counsel shall, unless the Bar Council otherwise directs, rank in seniority in accordance with their patents. All other counsel are Junior Counsel.
4.26 Devil
4.26.1 It is essential that practising advocates should retain their professional independence. Any system of payment which converts a devil’s services into employment by the members requesting such services is undesirable. It is not improper for the member requesting such services to show his or her appreciation therefor in tangible form, nor for the member and the devil to enter into an agreement that governs the rate of remuneration of the devil for the particular task assigned, provided such an arrangement does not convert into an employment relationship or one of or approximating partnership.
4.26.2 Although it is not unethical to disclose to the attorney that a devil is or will be used, it is not within the etiquette of the profession that the use of the devil be imposed on the attorney in any form. Save with the attorney’s prior consent, the devil should not be present at a consultation or take any active part in the conduct of the case in court.


Schools, Courts, Churches, and the Cult of Saturn

“When you graduate from high school you come out processionally with a black robe, which is black for Saffron, the God of the Hebrews, requiring that you wear the square mortarboard on top of your head.
 The square mortarboards are, of course, used by the Freemasons for their plaster, so that is why you wear a square mortarboard when you graduate, ultimately becoming an Alumni. It all has to do with Freemasonry; it all has to do with the control of education in this country.”
Jordan Maxwell, “Matrix of Power”
First you pay out your “tuition” to get into “universe”ity where they strip you of your Intuition and give you an Indoctrination.
 Then you receive a “MaStars” Masonic “degree,” while wearing a Masonic mortar board cap and Cult of Saturn black robes to become an Alumni/Illumini. Graduation means to increment or retard progress.
As Jordan Maxwell says, “the true meaning of Graduation is gradual indoctrination.”
Indeed.
“Saturn is an important key to understanding the long heritage this conspiracy has back to antiquity. The city of Rome was originally known as Saturnia or City of Saturn. The Roman Catholic church retains much of the Saturn worship in its ritual. Saturn also relates to Lucifer. In various occult dictionaries Saturn is associated with evil. Saturn was important to the religion of Mithra, and also the Druids.”
–Fritz Springmeier, “Bloodlines of the Illuminati
Also, Black’s Law Dictionary 4th Edition gives the legal definition of “OATH” as:
The term has been variously defined: as, “a solemn invocation of the vengeance of the Deity upon the witness if he do not declare the whole truth, so far as he knows it,” 1 Stark.Ev. 22;
Ask yourself: Who is the “vengeful Deity” these temple courts invoke?
An England maxim states – It is punishment enough for a judge that he has Deity as his avenger.

Freemasonry, Occults and Temples

When one begins investigating the origins of the customs, devices and occult symbolism used by the BAR legal system and courts (temples), one discovers a labyrinth of interwoven occult and mystery symbolism; to the point where it becomes hard to see any difference between ancient Babylon, Freemasonry, Mithraism and the courts of Papal Rome and England; even today; it is hidden in plain sight; as well as in the definitions of legal words;
Download a very brief investigation: Freemasonry Occults and Temples – 2018
Download text summary from BL.DICT. 4th ED. on the word “Temple”: Temple – BL.Dict. 4th EdTemple – BL.Dict. 4th Ed


There Are No “Fake Judges” and No “Sovereign Citizens” Either

By Anna Von Reitz
I have written several articles that explain the simple FACT that we are supposed to have TWO functioning court systems operating in the behalf of the people, one an admiralty court operating on the jurisdiction of the sea; one, a common law court
operating on the jurisdiction of the land. Duh, folks, how hard is this to grasp?

Conclusion

The BAR legal system is an occult, secret society, a false temple; it is a front for feudal imperialism; it operates by an assumed and presumed authority and in an unknown, foreign jurisdiction; and, tit’s rules only apply to bar members, corporations and those ACTing as agents, employees, or officials; and, theirs is merely the business of commerce between legal fictions, having no parity with the tangible;
A feudal law-of-the-sea legal system is incompatible with sovereign people and their sovereign states and law-of-the-land; these are two contra and distinct jurisdictions and subject matter;
In truth, the BAR legal system has neither jurisdiction over  the land, nor law-of-the-land, nor we the people, nor our private property, nor rights; that is the business of community courts, grand juries, jural assemblies, oversight committees, public hearings,  tribunals and TRCs by, for and of the people;
Share:

SEARCH

LIKE US

VISITORS STATUS


Wikipedia

Search results

Followers

TOTAL VISITORS

SUSCRIBE

BLOG TRAFFIC